資料來源: Google Book
The Domenichino affair :novelty, imitation, and theft in seventeenth-century Rome
- 作者: Cropper, Elizabeth,
- 出版: New Haven : Yale University Press c2005.
- 稽核項: xi, 266 p. :ill. (some col.) ;28 cm.
- 標題: Carracci, Agostino, 1557-1602. , Jerome, , Domenichino, , Carracci, Agostino, , Imitation in art. , Domenichino, 1581-1641 Authorship. , Jerome, Saint, d. 419 or 20 Art. , Authorship. , Painting, Renaissance Italy. , Painting, Renaissance
- ISBN: 0300109148 , 9780300109146
- 試查全文@TNUA:
- 附註: 94年度教育部「建構圖書館多元館藏曁服務品質提升計畫」購藏 Includes bibliographical references (p. 242-258) and index. Agostino Carracci's Last Communion of St. Jerome -- Domenichino's Last Communion of Saint Jerome -- Imitation, influence, invention: the Carracci and Tasso -- Novelty, translation, theft: controversy in the 1620s -- Begging, stealing, and being caught out: two centuries of debate -- Coda: a reflection on the history of art.
- 電子資源: https://dbs.tnua.edu.tw/login?url=http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0643/2005008545-b.html https://dbs.tnua.edu.tw/login?url=http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0643/2005008545-d.html
- 系統號: 005204595
- 資料類型: 圖書
- 讀者標籤: 需登入
- 引用網址: 複製連結
Ten years after completing his work The Last Communion of Saint Jerome, Bolognese painter Domenichino was accused by his rival Giovanni Lanfranco of stealing the idea for the painting from an altarpiece crafted by Lanfranco’s teacher, Agostino Carracci. The resulting scandal reverberated through the centuries, drawing responses by artists and critics from Poussin and Malvasia to Fuseli and Delacroix.Why was Domenichino attacked in this way when other related paintings--including Raphael’s Marriage of the Virgin and Perugino’s painting of the same subject--aroused no such negative response? In this fast-paced book, Elizabeth Cropper investigates the Domenichino affair and addresses the perennial debate regarding the precise nature of originality and of imitation. She offers close readings of the paintings involved in the story, detailed analysis of attitudes toward imitation, emulation, and plagiarism, and a fascinating discussion of what Domenichino’s plight signifies in art history.
來源: Google Book
來源: Google Book
評分