資料來源: Google Book
Democracy, risk, and community :technological hazards and the evolution of liberalism
- 作者: Hiskes, Richard P.,
- 出版: New York : Oxford University Press 1998.
- 稽核項: 1 online resource (viii, 197 pages).
- 叢書名: Environmental ethics and science policy series
- 標題: Politieke participatie. , HEALTH & FITNESS , Risk assessment. , Technology Risk assessment. , Technology , Risico's. , Electronic books. , Technologie Évaluation du risque. , HEALTH & FITNESS Safety. , Social aspects. , Évaluation du risque. , Technische vernieuwing. , Liberalisme. , Politique scientifique et technique. , Technology Social aspects. , Safety. , Technologie , Technology and state.
- ISBN: 0195353129 , 9780195353129
- ISBN: 0195120086
- 試查全文@TNUA:
- 附註: Includes bibliographical references (pages 183-191) and index. Introduction; ONE: Risk and the Redefinition of Politics; TWO: Risk, Consent, and Communal Identity; THREE: Risk and the Authority of Ends; FOUR: Risk, Self-interest, and the New Technology of Rights; FIVE: Risk and Responsibility; SIX: Democratic Politics and Participatory Risks; Notes; Bibliography; Index; A; B; C; D; E; F; G; H; I; J; K; L; M; N; O; P; Q; R; S; T; U; V; W.
- 摘要: Explores the connection between technological risk and basic concepts of liberal political theory and practice. The author argues that modern risks are emergent and therefore not reducible to individual actors or events, and that risks challenge basic concepts of liberal political theory.
- 電子資源: https://dbs.tnua.edu.tw/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=23507
- 系統號: 005286168
- 資料類型: 電子書
- 讀者標籤: 需登入
- 引用網址: 複製連結
This book presents a novel and compelling thesis about technological risk, liberalism, and policy making in liberal societies. Opposed to most theories of risk that focus on individual decision makers and models or rational choice, this book argues that risks must be seen as intrinsically both emergent and political phenomena. As such, risks resist reduction to individual actors, events, or decisions. To fully understand and make policy for risk, then, it is necessary to recognize that risks call attention to the connections between individuals and events, to the power being exercised in the determination and distribution of risks, and to how the failure to see risks as political, emergent phenomena results in policy failure, as in instances of "Not in My Backyard" (NIMBY) controversies. Liberal societies have particular difficulty in coping with risk, due to the excessively individualistic political theory and epistemology that undergirds liberalism. Thus, seeing risks as emergent has dramatic impact on the fundamental political concepts that make up liberal political theory and operate within liberal societies. The book treats especially the concepts of consent, community, authority, rights, responsibility, identity, and political participation. The meaning of each of these ideas has been altered by modern technological risks, and coping with risk will require that liberal societies redefine what these most basic concepts of political principles are to mean in political practice and policy making.
來源: Google Book
來源: Google Book
評分