Rights to health care

• 其他作者: Bole, Thomas J. , Bondeson, William B.,
• 出版: Dordrecht ;Boston : Kluwer Academic ©1991.
• 稽核項: 1 online resource (ix, 380 pages).
• 叢書名: Philosophy and medicine ;v. 38
• 標題: Droit à la santé , geneeskunde , Politique sanitaire. , MEDICAL , MEDICAL Health Risk Assessment. , Conference papers and proceedings. , Right to health , Philosophy (General) , Quality of Health Care , Congress , bioethics , Medical policy Congresses. , Medical policy. , medicine , filosofie , Politique sanitaire Congrès. , Right to health Congresses. , philosophy , Delivery of Health Care , Right to health. , Health Policy , Actes de congrès. , Droit à la santé Congrès. , Electronic books. , Medical policy , Medical care. , Health Risk Assessment. , economics , Recht op gezondheidszorg. , Politique sanitaire , Prestation de soins. , Filosofie (algemeen) , economie
• ISBN: 0585282951 , 9780585282954
• ISBN: 9780792311379 , 079231137X
• 試查全文@TNUA:
  
• 附註: Includes bibliographical references and index. Front Matter; The Rhetoric of Rights and Justice in Health Care; The Right to Health Care: Reflections on Its History and Politics; The Right to Health Care in a Capitalistic Democracy; Justice and the Right to Health Care: An Egalitarian Account; Rights to Health Care: Created, Not Discovered; Why the Right to Health Care is Not a Useful Concept for Policy Debates; Rights, Reforms, and the Health Care Crisis: Problems and Prospects; Rights, Obligations, and the Special Importance of Health Care; Access to Health Care: Charity and Rights. Equal Opportunity and Health Care Rights for the ElderlyFree Markets, Consumer Choice, and the Poor: Some Reasons for Caution; My Right to Care for my Health -- And What About the Needy and the Elderly?; Should Medicine be a Commodity? An Economist's Perspective; The Profit Motive in Kant and Hegel; Virtue for Hire: Some Reflections on Free Choice and the Profit Motive in the Delivery of Health Care; Rights, Public Policy, and the State; Back Matter.
• 摘要: Human existence is marked by pain, limitation, disability, disease, suffering, and death. These facts of life and of death give ample grounds for characterizing much of the human condition as unfortunate. A core philosophical question is whether the circumstances are in addition unfair or unjust in the sense of justifying claims on the resources, time, and abilities of others. The temptation to use the languages of rights and of justice is und- standable. Faced with pain, disability, and death, it seems natural to complain that "someone should do something", "this is unfair", or "it just isn't fight that people should suffer this way". Yet it is one thing to complain about the unfairness of another's actions, and another thing to complain about the unfairness of biological or physical processes. If no one is to blame for one's illness, disability, or death, in what sense are one's unfortunate circumstances unfair or unjust? How can claims against others for aid and support arise if no one has caused the unfortunate state of affairs? To justify the languages of fights to health care or justice in health care requires showing why particular unfortunate circumstances are also unfair, in the sense of demanding the labors of others. It requires understanding as well the limits of property claims. After all, claims regarding justice in health care or about fights to health care limit the property fights of those whose resources will be used to provide care.
• 電子資源: https://dbs.tnua.edu.tw/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=39642
• 系統號: 005291919
• 資料類型: 電子書
• 讀者標籤: 需登入
• 引用網址: 複製連結
• 目前引用數