資料來源: Google Book
The global expansion of judicial power
- 其他作者: Tate, C. Neal , Vallinder, Torbjörn.
- 出版: New York : New York University Press 1995.
- 稽核項: 1 online resource (xii, 556 pages) :illustrations.
- 標題: Politique et pouvoir judiciaire , Rechtsbescherming tegen de overheid. , Overheidsbeleid. , Pouvoir judiciaire , Rechtsmacht. , Poder judiciario (direito constitucional) , Pouvoir judiciaire. , Judicial power. , LAW Judicial Power. , Grondrechten. , Contrôle juridictionnel de l'administration. , Judicial process. , Judicial Power. , Direito processual. , Electronic books. , Politique et pouvoir judiciaire Études comparatives. , Politica internacional. , Pouvoir judiciaire Études comparatives. , Judicial review of administrative acts. , Contrôle juridictionnel de l'administration , LAW , Études comparatives. , Processus judiciaire. , Contrôle juridictionnel de l'administration Études comparatives.
- ISBN: 0814770061 , 9780814770061
- 試查全文@TNUA:
- 附註: Some papers were originally presented at the theme meeting "Judicialization of Politics", hosted by the Centro studi sull'ordinamento giudiziario, Bologna, University of Bologna, Forlí, Italy, June 1992. Includes bibliographical references and index.
- 摘要: In Russia, as the confrontation over the constitutional distribution of authority raged, Boris Yeltsin's economic program regularly wended its way in and out of the Constitutional Court until he finally suspended that court in the aftermath of his clash with the hard-line parliament. In Europe, French and German legislators and executives now routinely alter policies in response to, or in anticipation of, the pronouncements of constitutional courts. In Latin America and Africa, courts are - or will be - important participants in ongoing efforts to establish constitutional rules and policies to protect new or fragile democracies from the threats of military intervention, ethnic conflict, and revolution. This global expansion of judicial power, or "judicialization of politics," is accompanied by an increasing domination of negotiating or decision-making arenas by quasi-judicial procedures. For better or for worse, the judicialization of politics has become one of the most significant trends of the end of the millennium. In this book, political scientists, legal scholars, and judges from around the world trace the intellectual, origins of this trend, describe its occurrence - or lack of occurrence - in specific nations, analyze the circumstances and conditions that promote or retard judicialization, and evaluate the phenomenon from a variety of intellectual and ideological perspectives.
- 電子資源: https://dbs.tnua.edu.tw/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=48279
- 系統號: 005293145
- 資料類型: 電子書
- 讀者標籤: 需登入
- 引用網址: 複製連結
In Russia, as the confrontation over the constitutional distribution of authority raged, Boris Yeltsin's economic program regularly wended its way in and out of the Constitutional Court until Yeltsin finally suspended that court in the aftermath of his clash with the hard-line parliament. In Europe, French and German legislators and executives now routinely alter desired policies in response to or in anticipation of the pronouncements of constitutional courts. In Latin America and Africa, courts are--or will be-- important participants in ongoing efforts to establish constitutional rules and policies protect new or fragile democracies from the threats of military intervention, ethnic conflict, and revolution. This global expansion of judicial power, or judicialization of politics is accompanied by an increasing domination of negotiating or decision making arenas by quasi- judicial procedures. For better or for worse, the judicialization of politics has become one of the most significant trends of the end of the millenium. In this book, political scientists, legal scholars, and judges around the world trace the intellectual origins of this trend, describe its occurence--or lack of occurence--in specific nations, analyze the circumstances and conditions that promote or retard judicialization, and evaluate the phenomenon from a variety of intellectual and ideological perspectives.
來源: Google Book
來源: Google Book
評分