資料來源: Google Book
Zen and the art of postmodern philosophy :two paths of liberation from the representational mode of thinking
- 作者: Olson, Carl.
- 出版: New York : State University of New York Press 2000.
- 稽核項: 1 online resource (xii, 309 pages).
- 標題: Philosophie. , Bouddhisme zen , Zen Buddhism Philosophy. , Postmodernism , Philosophy. , Zen Buddhism , Philosophy & Religion. , Buddhism. , PHILOSOPHY , Religion. , PHILOSOPHY Buddhist. , Buddhist. , Postmodernism Religious aspects -- Zen Buddhism. , Religious aspectsZen Buddhism. , Bouddhisme zen Philosophie. , Electronic books.
- ISBN: 0791492214 , 9780791492215
- 試查全文@TNUA:
- 附註: Includes bibliographical references and index.
- 電子資源: https://dbs.tnua.edu.tw/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=51875
- 系統號: 005295402
- 資料類型: 電子書
- 讀者標籤: 需登入
- 引用網址: 複製連結
This book examines and compares the philosophical positions of various postmodern thinkers and Zen Buddhist philosophers on: language and play; modes of thinking; skepticism and doubt; self and other; time and death; nihilism and metaphysics; and the conception of the end of philosophy. The Zen thinkers dealt with are Dogen and Nishitani, and the Western thinkers are Derrida, Lacan, Heidegger, Lyotard, Foucault, Deleuze and Guatarri, Kristeva, and Levinas. Although each share similar notions concerning the shortcomings of representational thinking, major differences still exist. By clarifying these differences, Olson counters the tendency to overtly assert or covertly imply that postmodern and Zen philosophies are moving in the same direction. Some postmodern thinkers and Zen Buddhist philosophers share common philosophical ground with regard to a mutual philosophical attack and attempt to overcome the perceived shortcomings of the representational mode of thinking that conceives of the mind like a mirror and assumes a correspondence between appearance and reality that is supported by a metaphysical structure.
來源: Google Book
來源: Google Book
評分