Critiques of knowing :situated textualities in science, computing and the arts
- 作者: Hunter, Lynette.
- 出版: London ;New York : Routledge 2002.
- 稽核項: 1 online resource (vii, 246 pages).
- 標題: Science Philosophy. , epistemology. , Intelligence artificielle. , Philosophy. , Science , PHILOSOPHY , Artificial intelligence. , artificial intelligence. , PHILOSOPHY Epistemology. , Electronic books. , Epistemology. , Théorie de la connaissance. , Knowledge, Theory of. , Artificial Intelligence
- ISBN: 0415192579 , 9780415192576
- 試查全文@TNUA:
- 附註: Includes bibliographical references and index. Book Cover; Title; Contents; Acknowledgements; Introduction; The ethos of the nation state: ideology, discourse and standpoint; Rhetoric and artificial intelligence: computing applications in the sciences and humanities; AI and representation: a study of a rhetorical context for intellectual legitimacy; The socialising of context: methodologies for hypertext; Feminist critiques of science: from standpoint to rhetorical stance; A feminist critique of the rhetorical stance of contemporary aesthetics: alternative standpoints; Notes; Bibliography; Index
- 摘要: An exploration of what happens to science and computing when we think of them as texts. Lynette Hunter weaves together such vast areas of thought as: rhetoric, politics, AI, computing, feminism, science studies, aesthetics and epistemology.
- 電子資源: https://dbs.tnua.edu.tw/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=68927
- 系統號: 005297929
- 資料類型: 電子書
- 讀者標籤: 需登入
- 引用網址: 複製連結
Exploring what happens to science and computing when we think of them as texts. author Lynette Hunter weaves together such vast areas of thought as: rhetoric, politics, AI, computing, feminism, science studies, aesthetics and epistemology. Hunter takes the recent work on situated knowledge and argues that since we cannot have knowledge without communication, we need to think long and hard about textual strategies used when we try to locate knowledge in or from a particular place. She argues that the feminist standpoint critique of science hasn't considered the textual implications for such an approach and suggests that the arts and humanities are just as far behind in terms of democratizing access and evaluation, as the sciences. The text argues that what we need is a radical shake-up of approaches to the arts if the critiques of science and computing are to come to any fruition.
來源: Google Book
來源: Google Book
評分