資料來源: Google Book
The Mormon question :polygamy and constitutional conflict in nineteenth-century America
- 作者: Gordon, Sarah Barringer,
- 出版:
- 稽核項: 1 online resource (xiv, 337 pages) :illustrations.
- 叢書名: Studies in legal history
- 標題: Freedom of religion. , Mormonen , Polygamy , Church and state , Electronic books. , LAW Constitutional. , Polygamy. , History. , Church and state. , Polygamy Utah -- History. , Public. , Constitutional Law - U.S. , Legal status, laws, etc.History. , Geschichte 1800-1900 , Church and state United States -- History. , Mormons Legal status, laws, etc. -- United States -- History. , Freedom of religion United States -- History. , Utah. , Law - U.S. , Legal status, laws, etc. , Law, Politics & Government. , Verfassungsstreitigkeit , USA. , Constitutional. , LAW Public. , Mormons , Mormons Legal status, laws, etc. , United States. , Freedom of religion , LAW
- ISBN: 0807875260 , 9780807875261
- ISBN: 9780807826614 , 0807826618 , 9780807849873 , 0807849871
- 試查全文@TNUA:
- 附註: Includes bibliographical references (pages 297-321) and index. Introduction: Faith and the contested Constitution -- Part one. The laws of God and the laws of man. The power of the word(s). The twin relic of barbarism. The logic of resistance -- Part two. Days of judgment. Law and patriarchy at the Supreme Court. The erosion of sympathy. The marital economy -- Epilogue: The (un)faithful Constitution.
- 摘要: "The conflict over polygamy became the preoccupation of novelists, journalists, political cartoonists, and newspaper editors, clerics, lecturers, lobbyists, woman's rights activists, political theorists, missionaries, state and national politicians, criminal defendants and their families, constitutional and criminal defense lawyers, federal and territorial officials, presidents, and Supreme Court justices. This book is about their efforts to explain why the practice of polygamy in the Mormon territory (eventually state) of Utah and surrounding jurisdictions created a constitutional conflict over the meaning and scope of liberty and democracy in the United States. Vast quantities of ink and paper were invested in the project, and yield rich rewards. The 'Mormon Question, ' as many nineteenth-century Americans called it, posed fundamental questions about religion, marriage, and constitutional law. The national Constitution must not shield such immorality, those who opposed polygamy (antipolygamists) argued, or liberty would be fatally compromised. There must be a relationship between the structures of government created by the Constitution and the structures of Christian morality that made civilized life possible. The doubt that swirled about the moral nature of the Constitution, however, meant that such claims were always tinged by uncertainty. Real and significant differences about the core of sovereign authority in America propelled defenders of monogamy into untested constitutional theories, as they struggled to articulate how the national government could assume authority over marriage and faith in Utah. Most important, such arguments met with fierce resistance from Mormons"--Introduction, pages 1/4 (illustrations intervening).
- 電子資源: https://dbs.tnua.edu.tw/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=79156
- 系統號: 005300413
- 資料類型: 電子書
- 讀者標籤: 需登入
- 引用網址: 複製連結
From the Mormon Church's public announcement of its sanction of polygamy in 1852 until its formal decision to abandon the practice in 1890, people on both sides of the "Mormon question" debated central questions of constitutional law. Did principles of religious freedom and local self-government protect Mormons' claim to a distinct, religiously based legal order? Or was polygamy, as its opponents claimed, a new form of slavery--this time for white women in Utah? And did constitutional principles dictate that democracy and true liberty were founded on separation of church and state? As Sarah Barringer Gordon shows, the answers to these questions finally yielded an apparent victory for antipolygamists in the late nineteenth century, but only after decades of argument, litigation, and open conflict. Victory came at a price; as attention and national resources poured into Utah in the late 1870s and 1880s, antipolygamists turned more and more to coercion and punishment in the name of freedom. They also left a legacy in constitutional law and political theory that still governs our treatment of religious life: Americans are free to believe, but they may well not be free to act on their beliefs.
來源: Google Book
來源: Google Book
評分