附註:Includes bibliographical references (pages 195-207) and index.
Introduction -- Chap. 1. Explaining compliance -- Chap. 2. Procedural justice and compliance -- Chap. 3. Conceptualizing and measuring compliance -- Chap. 4. Predicting compliance -- Chap. 5. Compliance requests for self-control -- Chap. 6. Requests for identification : measures and models -- Chap. 7. Conditional effects -- Chap. 8. Conclusions and future research -- Notes -- Appendix -- References -- Index.
摘要:Using observational data from two metropolitan police departments, McCluskey studies citizen compliance with police requests for self-control in face-to-face encounters. The central question is whether coercive tactics (e.g. commanding a suspect) or "procedurally just" tactics (e.g. giving a suspect the opportunity to tell his or her side of the situation) are more powerful in explaining citizen's decisions to comply with police requests. A series of multivariate logistic models indicate that the "justness" of police tactics has the greatest power in explaining why citizens comply with police requests for self-control.