Overruled? :legislative overrides, pluralism, and contemporary court-Congress relations
- 作者: Barnes, Jeb.
- 出版: Stanford, Calif. : Stanford University Press 2004.
- 稽核項: 1 online resource (xi, 219 pages) :illustrations.
- 標題: Politique et pouvoir judiciaire , Statutes. , POLITICAL SCIENCE , Politique et pouvoir judiciaire États-Unis. , Electronic books. , LAW Civil Procedure. , Statuts États-Unis. , Judicial review , Political questions and judicial power United States. , GovernmentJudicial Branch. , LAW Legal Services. , Statutes , Political questions and judicial power , Interpretation and construction. , Civil Procedure. , Electronic book. , Contrôle juridictionnel des lois , POLITICAL SCIENCE Government -- Judicial Branch. , Judicial review. , Droit États-Unis -- Interprétation. , Contrôle juridictionnel des lois États-Unis. , Law Interpretation and construction. , Judicial review United States. , Statuts , Interprétation. , Legal Services. , Law , Political questions and judicial power. , Statutes United States. , Droit , United States. , Law United States -- Interpretation and construction. , LAW
- ISBN: 0804767203 , 9780804767200
- 試查全文@TNUA:
- 附註: Includes bibliographical references and index. Background. The questions, debate, and overview ; Overrides in contemporary U.S. policy-making : promise and current understanding -- pt. I. Do overrides matter? assumptions and hypotheses ; Data, methods, and findings -- pt. II. What patterns of court-Congress relations underlie the override process? A typology of override scenarios -- Operationalization of typology, findings, and discussions -- Under what conditions ...? patterns and hypotheses -- Conclusion. Broader implications and avenues for future inquiry -- Appendix: summary of overrides analyzed.
- 電子資源: https://dbs.tnua.edu.tw/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=110076
- 系統號: 005308661
- 資料類型: 電子書
- 讀者標籤: 需登入
- 引用網址: 複製連結
Since the mid-1970s, Congress has passed hundreds of overrides—laws that explicitly seek to reverse or modify judicial interpretations of statutes. Whether front-page news or not, overrides serve potentially vital functions in American policy-making. Federal statutes—and court cases interpreting them—often require revision. Some are ambiguous, some conflict, and others are obsolete. Under these circumstances, overrides promise Congress a means to repair flawed statutes, reconcile discordant court decisions, and reverse errant judicial interpretations. Overrides also allow dissatisfied litigants to revisit issues and raise concerns in Congress that courts have overlooked. Of course, promising is one thing and delivering is quite another. Accordingly, this book asks: Do overrides, in fact, effectively clarify the law, reverse objectionable judicial statutory interpretations, and broaden deliberation on contested issues? The answers provide new insights into the complex role of overrides in U.S. policy-making and in the politics of contemporary court-Congress relations.
來源: Google Book
來源: Google Book
評分