Deciding to leave :the politics of retirement from the United States Supreme Court
- 作者: Ward, Artemus,
- 出版: Albany : State University of New York Press ©2003.
- 稽核項: 1 online resource (xiii, 344 pages) :illustrations.
- 叢書名: SUNY series in American constitutionalism
- 標題: United States. Supreme Court. , United States. Supreme Court Officials and employees -- Retirement. , Judges , Retirement , États-Unis. , Judges Retirement -- United States. , Retraite , Judges Retirement. , GovernmentFederal. , Juges Retraite -- États-Unis. , Juges , Electronic books. , FonctionnairesRetraite. , États-Unis. Supreme Court Fonctionnaires -- Retraite. , United States. , LAW Government -- Federal. , LAW , Officials and employeesRetirement. , Retirement.
- ISBN: 0791487229 , 9780791487228
- 試查全文@TNUA:
- 附註: Includes bibliographical references (pages 313-328) and index.
- 摘要: While much has been written on Supreme Court appointments, Deciding to Leave provides the first systematic look at the process by which justices decide to retire from the bench, and why this has become increasingly partisan in recent years. Since 1954, generous retirement provisions and decreasing workloads have allowed justices to depart strategically when a president of their own party occupies the White House. Otherwise, the justices remain in their seats, often past their ability to effectively participate in the work of the Court. While there are benefits and drawbacks to various reform proposals, Ward argues that mandatory retirement goes farthest in combating partisanship and protecting the institution of the Court.
- 電子資源: https://dbs.tnua.edu.tw/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=112740
- 系統號: 005308869
- 資料類型: 電子書
- 讀者標籤: 需登入
- 引用網址: 複製連結
While much has been written on Supreme Court appointments, Deciding to Leave provides the first systematic look at the process by which justices decide to retire from the bench, and why this has become increasingly partisan in recent years. Since 1954, generous retirement provisions and decreasing workloads have allowed justices to depart strategically when a president of their own party occupies the White House. Otherwise, the justices remain in their seats, often past their ability to effectively participate in the work of the Court. While there are benefits and drawbacks to various reform proposals, Ward argues that mandatory retirement goes farthest in combating partisanship and protecting the institution of the Court.
來源: Google Book
來源: Google Book
評分
