The front-loading problem in presidential nominations
- 作者: Mayer, William G.,
- 其他作者: Busch, Andrew.
- 出版: Washington, D.C. : Brookings Institution Press ©2004.
- 稽核項: 1 online resource (x, 226 pages).
- 標題: Political ProcessPolitical Parties. , Caucus. , Electronic books. , USA , Nomination. , Presidents , Political ProcessElections. , Kandidatur , Élections primaires États-Unis. , USA President , Presidents Nomination. , Primaries. , POLITICAL SCIENCE , Élections primaires , POLITICAL SCIENCE Political Process -- Elections. , Presidents United States -- Nomination. , Primaries , POLITICAL SCIENCE Political Process -- Political Parties. , United States. , Primaries United States.
- ISBN: 0815755198 , 9780815755197
- ISBN: 0815755198 , 0815755201 , 9780815755203
- 試查全文@TNUA:
- 附註: Includes bibliographical references (pages 181-216) and index. Introduction -- The rise of front-loading -- Explaining front-loading -- The consequences of front-loading -- Proposed solutions -- The politics of nomination reform -- Conclusion -- Appendix A. On measuring front-loading -- Appendix B. Specification of the regression equations in tables 3-4 and 3-5 -- Appendix C.A note on delegate counts.
- 摘要: Front-loading is the single most criticized feature of the American presidential selection process. This text addresses the front-loading problem, providing a comprehensive examination of the entire issue: what it is, when and why it was developed, and its consequences for the nomination process.
- 電子資源: https://dbs.tnua.edu.tw/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=112204
- 系統號: 005309039
- 資料類型: 電子書
- 讀者標籤: 需登入
- 引用網址: 複製連結
Front-loading has emerged in several US election cycles and is the single most criticized feature of the American presidential selection process. Where state primaries and caucuses were once spread out over a period of three or four months, most are now crammed into a four- or five-week interval at the very beginning of the delegate selection calendar. The system that results has been called absurdly accelerated, dangerously irrational, warped and virtually mindless and a parody of participatory democracy.
來源: Google Book
來源: Google Book
評分
