資料來源: Google Book
Beyond regulations :ethics in human subjects research
- 其他作者: King, Nancy M. P. , Henderson, Gail, , Stein, Jane.
- 出版: Chapel Hill, NC : University of North Carolina Press ©1999.
- 稽核項: 1 online resource (xii, 279 pages) :illustrations.
- 叢書名: Studies in social medicine
- 標題: Cross-Cultural Comparison , Moral and ethical aspects. , MEDICAL , Cross-cultural studies. , Expérimentation humaine en médecine , Ethics. , Case studies. , Congress , Ethics, Medical , Expérimentation humaine en médecine. , Human experimentation in medicine , MEDICAL Ethics. , Études de cas. , Human experimentation in medicine Moral and ethical aspects -- Case studies. , Human Experimentation , Aspect moral , Actes de congrès. , Electronic books. , Human experimentation in medicine. , Études transculturelles. , Moral and ethical aspects , Human experimentation in medicine Moral and ethical aspects. , Expérimentation humaine en médecine Aspect moral -- Études de cas. , Éthique médicale. , Conference papers and proceedings.
- ISBN: 0807876062 , 9780807876060
- ISBN: 0807824682 , 9780807824689 , 0807847704 , 9780807847701
- 試查全文@TNUA:
- 附註: Includes bibliographical references (pages 258-271) and index. Relationships in research: a new paradigm / Nancy M.P. King, Gail E. Henderson, and Jane Stein -- Is ethics universal?: gender, science, and culture in reproductive health research / Ruth Macklin -- Contract and covenant in Curaca̧o: reciprocal relationships in scholarly research / Alan F. Benjamin -- Contract and covenant in ethnographic research / Reneé C. Fox -- The gaze of scholars and subjects: roles, relationships, and obligations in ethnographic research / Sue E. Estroff -- Community assessment and perceptions: preparation for HIV vaccine efficacy trials / Lynn Blanchard -- Community advisory board-investigator relationships in community-based HIV/AIDS research / Ronald P. Strauss -- Research parnerships and people "at risk": HIV vaccine efficacy trials and African American communities / Keith A. Wailoo -- Truth-in-funding: studying the infant-feeding controversy with industry support / Barry M. Popkin -- Bias and conflict of interest in science: controversial industry funding of infant-feeding studies / Loretta M. Kopelman -- Context and community: assessing the ethics of industry-funded research / Allan M. Brandt and Lara Freidenfelds -- Research on induced abortion in Argentina: avoiding self-incrimination / Jorge Balań and Silvina Ramos -- Research on induced abortion in Argentina: avoiding self-incrimination / Cynthia Waszak -- The contexts of social research / Barbara Entwisle -- Maltreatment in families: a research dilemma / Desmond K. Runyan -- Child abuse research: can ethical standards be the same in developed and developing countries? / Marcela Aracena Alvarez -- Research in distressed families: how should societies make judgments about parents and children? / Nancy M.P. King -- Can community consultation substitute for informed consent in emergency medicine research? / Ernest N. Kraybill and B. Susan Bauer -- Can community consultation substitute for informed consent in emergency medicine research: a response / J. Pat Browder -- Medical re
- 電子資源: https://dbs.tnua.edu.tw/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=137917
- 系統號: 005320256
- 資料類型: 電子書
- 讀者標籤: 需登入
- 引用網址: 複製連結
Across a broad range of disciplines--in medicine, social science, and the humanities--researchers, scholars, teachers, and administrators increasingly are looking for new ways to approach ethical issues in research with human subjects. Questions about how relationships between funders and researchers should affect research design, for example, or whether the potential benefits of research can outweigh the importance of its subjects' interests are inadequately addressed by the prevailing, regulation-based research ethics paradigm. This book constitutes a reexamination of research ethics. It combines case studies and commentaries by a multidisciplinary group of scholars and researchers to explore such topics as informed consent, conflict of interest, confidentiality, and research on illegal behavior. All human subjects research takes place within complex social, cultural, and political contexts, the contributors argue. Increased consideration of the relationships between researchers and their subjects, funders, and institutions within these contexts will facilitate research that is sensitive and responsible as well as scientifically fruitful. Beyond Regulations features a keynote essay by Ruth Macklin. Other contributors are Marcela Aracena Alvarez, Jorge Balan, B. Susan Bauer, Alan F. Benjamin, Lynn Blanchard, Allan M. Brandt, J. Pat Browder, Barbara Entwisle, Sue E. Estroff, Renee C. Fox, Lara Freidenfelds, Gail E. Henderson, Nancy M. P. King, Loretta M. Kopelman, Ernest N. Kraybill, Barry M. Popkin, Silvina Ramos, Desmond K. Runyan, Jane Stein, Ronald P. Strauss, Keith A. Wailoo, and Cynthia Waszak. Across a broad range of disciplines--in biomedicine, the social sciences, and the humanities--researchers, scholars, administrators, and teachers increasingly struggle with questions of ethics in research with human subjects. All research takes place in complex social, cultural, political, and economic contexts; yet the prevailing principle-based research ethics paradigm does not adequately account for them. This book reexamines research ethics using a new relationships paradigm. Through in-depth cases, commentaries, and essays, a multidisciplinary group of scholars and researchers addresses informed consent, conflict of interest, confidentiality, and other issues, considering questions like: What relationships should researchers have with their subjects' communities? When researchers and subjects have different views about research, who should have control? How should relationships between funders and researchers affect research design? Can research be so potentially beneficial that its importance outweighs the interests of subjects? Examining the relationships between researchers and subjects, communities, funders, and institutions--including considerations of authority and voice--can facilitate human subjects research that is morally sensitive and responsible as well as scientifically fruitful.
來源: Google Book
來源: Google Book
評分