資料來源: Google Book

Comparative constitutional reasoning[electronic resource]

  • 其他作者: Jakab, András. , Dyevre, Arthur. , Itzcovich, Giulio.
  • 出版: Cambridge : Cambridge University Press 2017.
  • 稽核項: xii, 854 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
  • 標題: Constitutional courts. , Constitutional law.
  • ISBN: 1107449766 , 9781107449763
  • 試查全文@TNUA:
  • 附註: Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 03 May 2017).
  • 摘要: To what extent is the language of judicial opinions responsive to the political and social context in which constitutional courts operate? Courts are reason-giving institutions, with argumentation playing a central role in constitutional adjudication. However, a cursory look at just a handful of constitutional systems suggests important differences in the practices of constitutional judges, whether in matters of form, style, or language. Focusing on independently-verified leading cases globally, a combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis offers the most comprehensive and systematic account of constitutional reasoning to date. This analysis is supported by the examination of eighteen legal systems around the world including the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice. Universally common aspects of constitutional reasoning are identified in this book, and contributors also examine whether common law countries differ to civil law countries in this respect.
  • 電子資源: https://dbs.tnua.edu.tw/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316084281
  • 系統號: 005325505
  • 資料類型: 電子書
  • 讀者標籤: 需登入
  • 引用網址: 複製連結
To what extent is the language of judicial opinions responsive to the political and social context in which constitutional courts operate? Courts are reason-giving institutions, with argumentation playing a central role in constitutional adjudication. However, a cursory look at just a handful of constitutional systems suggests important differences in the practices of constitutional judges, whether in matters of form, style, or language. Focusing on independently-verified leading cases globally, a combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis offers the most comprehensive and systematic account of constitutional reasoning to date. This analysis is supported by the examination of eighteen legal systems around the world including the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice. Universally common aspects of constitutional reasoning are identified in this book, and contributors also examine whether common law countries differ to civil law countries in this respect.
來源: Google Book
評分