資料來源: Google Book
Topicality and representation :Islam and Muslims in two Renaissance plays
- 作者: Obaid, Hammood Khalid,
- 出版:
- 稽核項: xi, 256 pages :illustrations ;22 cm.
- 標題: English literature Islamic influences. , Islamic influences. , English drama , Peele, George, , English literature , Muslims in literature. , Percy, William, , Peele, George, 1556-1596. , English drama Islamic influences. , Percy, William, 1575-1648. , Islam in literature.
- ISBN: 1443850608 , 9781443850605
- 附註: 103年科技部補助人文及社會科學研究圖書設備計畫規畫主題:藝術學:全球化與劇場跨界 Includes bibliographical references (pages 238-256).
- 摘要: "This book focuses on the importance of topical reading in understanding Islamic figures and themes, and applies this approach to two landmark Elizabethan plays: George Peele's Battle of Alcazar and William Percy's Mahomet and his Heaven. The former is the first English play to present a Moor as a major character, while the latter is the first English play to be based on Quranic material and feature the Prophet of Islam as a major character. In both plays, the book argues, topical concerns played a major role in the formation of Islamic characters and themes, rendering the term 'representation' highly debatable. The book also briefly covers other Elizabethan plays that contained Islamic elements"--Back cover.
- 系統號: 005257407
- 資料類型: 圖書
- 讀者標籤: 需登入
- 引用網址: 複製連結
The primary objective of this thesis is to examine the role played by topical concerns in the "representation" of Muslims and Islam in two important Elizabethan plays. The two plays are George Peele's The Battle of Alcazar (1589) and William Percy's Mahomet and his Heaven (1601). The former play was the first to introduce a Moor in major role, while the latter was the first play to be purportedly based on Quranic material and the first play to present the Prophet of Islam as a dramatic character. My study views topical interests as the major factor informing the depiction of Muslims in both plays and questions the term "representation" of Islam after taking these interests in consideration. My methodology is akin to the New Historicist approach in that it tries to posit a close relationship between the two selected plays and their political and religious milieu. The presence of an ideological commitment in both authors, albeit to different currents of thought, is seen as an important factor that challenges the very idea of a representation of Islam. Briefly, I argue that what we see in these two plays is less a representation of existing knowledge of the Muslim Other, and more a topical construction reflecting very local contemporary issues and events. Chapter One focuses on Peele's Battle of Alcazar as an ideologically-based pro-government work. The play was written shortly after the Spanish Armada in 1588, a time when England was undergoing serious political turmoil. Of special interest is the visit of the first Moroccan ambassador to London in 1589, which probably coincided with the play's performance. Special attention is paid to the dramatic side and characterization in the play with the aim of showing how, in his play, Peele was interested in promoting Queen Elizabeth's new allies, the Moors, more than presenting a good or an evil Moor. Chapter Two studies Percy's Mahomet and hZJ Heaven as the product of a tense and complex set of circumstances relating to both the playwright and late Elizabethan England. Contemporary views on magic, women, and the Catholic-Protestant schism all play a role in forming the final outcome which constructs a topical allegory of England rather than a representation of Islamic Arabia. Together, my analyses of these important plays show that the Muslim figure was, more often than not, constructed from topical and local material that was hardly based on original existing knowledge about Islam. In my conclusion, I suggest that the same may be true of other plays and texts of the period.
來源: Google Book
來源: Google Book
評分